anonymousalchemist:

anonymousalchemist:

ive been thinking about that thing where frankenstein is like. college dropout. makes patchwork boys in his lab. angsts a lot. and i just think this has some real potential for a modern version where hes not the main character per-say but you know, frank, who makes construct people in his garage, yeah, he dropped out of his program last year but he keeps saying he’s gonna go back but his terribly beautiful monster boy says that frank is lying to himself. i just think he has a lot of potential as a side character. 

actually what i think would be funny is if this was told from the point of frankenstein’s monster (who is in the process of trying out names for himself tyvm, his DUMBASS CREATOR has NEGLECTED to GIVE HIM A NAME, and anyway hes an ADULT and can NAME HIMSELF — right now he’s trying to get people to call him “prometheus” but its really not catching on) who is mostly just exasperatedly annoyed with his sadboy dad/roommate/frenemy and has resorted to tactics such as “pouring a bucket of water on frank’s head to make him get up in the morning” and “befriending all his friends and asking them whats franks deal” and “threatening to call frank’s dad if frank doesnt fuckin get up and pay their rent” 

anyway this ends up being a story about how 2 deal with Being A Person in two very different ways. but also it has to do with How Annoying Sadboys Are /jkjk 

tales-from-goldshire:

tumblunni:

coffeebuddha:

the most unstoppable force of nature is a cat that’s decided it wants to cuddle with you

As It Should Be

pauladeen-vevo:

spacexualkids:

achilles is so often called gay by the community and straight by society even though he fell in love with men and women. freddie mercury is known as the most famous gay man even though he self identified as bisexual. channing tatum is constantly called straight even though he’s dated men and women. evan rachel wood and angelina jolie and drew barrymore–all self identified bi women constantly called straight.

sappho wrote love poems for both men and women and yalls response to the idea that she might have been bi is “there was no concept of bi/gay back then!! let’s focus on the fact that she was sapphic!!” to the point where her name has become synonymous with gay and she’s called a lesbian icon and y’all only seem to have issues with “concepts” and labels when the concept/label is BI. why am i not surprised?

bisexuality is valid pass it on

right but youre mistaking the “two sapphos”