baronessblack:

epicene-street-light:

epicene-street-light:

I HAD TO ARGUE IN FRONT OF THE WHOLE CLASS THAT HETEROPHOBIA DOESNT FUCKING EXIST AND THATS ITS ACTUALLY SUPER DISRESPECTFUL TO TALK ABOUT “HETEROPHOBIA” TO DESCRIBE PERFECTLY HEALTHY REACTIONS TO HARDCORE HOMOPHOBIA THEN THEY TOLD ME I WAS “TOO ASSERTIVE” LIKE BITCH???? HAVE YOU EVER HAD A THOUSAND STUDENTS ACTIVELY WANT YOU DEAD?????? SHUT THE FUCK UP

AFTER CLASS WE TALKED ABOUT RACISM AND I HAD TO FIGHT WITH LIKE 6 OTHER WHITE PEOPLE ABOUT HOW REVERSE RACISM DOESN’T FUCKING E X I S T

I didnt even try to tell them we, as white ppl, all benefit from racism & have to unlearn our racist views cuz it would have been “too extreme” for them like… guys this is basic knowledge okay

@epicene-street-light I love you. Will you marry me? ❤️

haha thank you!! 😘

lgaylah:

lgaylah:

can….. we stop treating the bone shit like a tumblr funny thing like. u know how honest to god nauseous it actually feels to see a white person prancing around with a child of colour’s skeleton like it’s an ornament piece..???

the way she fucking says it’s “definitely better” in her care too bc she “appreciates it”. that was a literal person you’re carrying around. a literal child. it isn’t a cool rock or some shit that’s good in ur care cause you polish it up all nice and tidy like that’s a literal. child. white people literally have no fucking respect and love to treat poc like objects of curiousity and like. literally i do not care if you have an appreciation for collecting dead animals or some shit, but treating a dead child of colour akin to a dead animal is literally so fucked and i do not have to tell you why freak

also yes this is ok for whites to reblog lol

katzedecimal:

fantasiawandering:

laughlikesomethingbroken:

digitaldiscipline:

midnightmindcave:

bold-sartorial-statement:

systlin:

beautifultoastdream:

thatlittleegyptologist:

rudjedet:

thoodleoo:

quousque:

thoodleoo:

i hate when people in movies/tv are reading ancient languages and they translate everything really smoothly and poetically, as if when people who study ancient languages aren’t consulting three different commentaries and sobbing profusely when we read

ok so like…. it says

“come you all into the deepest cavern, or maybe that’s fireplace, depends on usage, and having come may you give your…. treasures? Skin? Pants? I don’t know, something…. to the….. about-to-be-adored guy, that one who…. okay, he either causes earthquakes or sleeps a lot, I think this might be an idiom….”

“ok, sorry that took so long and i hate to disappoint but i’m still not entirely sure what it means, like, it could be something about a religious ceremony or it could be a dick joke. leaning towards dick joke, might be both. knowing the ancients, probably both. this could very well be an ancient dick temple and we should probably leave.”

Funnest part is when you get shit like this:

Why yes that is a text comprised of almost exclusively crocodile hieroglyphs.

We also can’t get a coherent translation because the grammar makes absolutely no sense. Participles and Participial statements all the way. Sobek who is Crocodile of Crocodopolis who advances the Crocodile for the Crocodiles….

The crocodile hieroglyph is also used to write sovereign and an adjective meaning power…so the text is suuuuuuuper confusing.

I can’t help but wonder if the crocodile hieroglyph text (which I never knew about, that is AMAZING) is the ancient equivalent of a sestina or another complex poem form. With the crocodile symbol meaning so many different things, and the result being so difficult to translate, it might make more sense as a poem or some other stylistically rigid text.

Either that, or it was the Egyptian equivalent of a student being made to write lines on the chalkboard.

I will not take the name of Lord Sobek in vain

I will not take the name of Lord Sobek in vain

I will not take the name of Lord Sobek in vain

I will not…“Shakes out chiseling hand” Take the name of Lord Sobek in vain….

Looks like an ancient shitpost to me.

mai nayme is hep
and wen i wryt
upon the wal
so smooth and wite
i bless the kynnge
commend his akh
but then get tyred
and carve the croc

It’s the equivalent of “Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.”

this is making me think of that story that was written in order to explain why simplifying Chinese characters to one character per syllable is a really bad idea

Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek 

Sobek Sobek

Hathor, Hathor

Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek

Hathor, Hathor

Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek

Hathor, Hathor

Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek Sobek  Sobek Sobek

Ahh Set! Ahh Set!

Set! It’s Set! Ooooo, it’s a Set!

Did you just

iesika:

noirandchocolate:

“A British bookshop chain held a vote to find the country’s favourite book. It was The Lord of the Rings. Another one not long afterwards, held this time to find the favourite author, came up with J.R.R. Tolkien. The critics carped, which was expected but nevertheless strange. After all, the bookshops were merely using the word favourite. That’s a very personal word. No one ever said it was a synonym for best. But a critic’s chorus hailed the results as a terrible indictment of the taste of the British public, who’d been given the precious gift of democracy and were wasting it on quite unsuitable choices. There were hints of a conspiracy amongst the furry-footed fans. But there was another message, too. It ran: ‘Look, we’ve been trying to tell you for years which books are good! And you just don’t listen! You’re not listening now! You’re just going out there and buying this damn book! And the worst part is that we can’t stop you! We can tell you it’s rubbish, it’s not relevant, it’s the worst kind of escapism, it was written by an author who never came to our parties and didn’t care what we thought, but unfortunately the law allows you to go on not listening! You are stupid, stupid, stupid!’ And once again, no one listened. Instead, a couple of years later, a national newspaper’s Millennium Masterworks poll produced five works of what could loosely be called ‘narrative fiction’ among the top fifty ‘masterworks’ of the last thousand years, and, yes, there was The Lord of the Rings again.”

— Terry Pratchett, “Cult Classic” (A Slip of the Keyboard)
(Still burning mad that at least one critic did the same exact kind of carping about Pratchett’s body of work being praised by its fans, shortly after his death.)

I stumbled on an article last night where some douche was ranting about how mad he was that, in the wake of Terry’s death, people were mourning and calling him a great writer when they should have been reading something sublime like Bukowski.

In the first paragraph he said he’d never read anything by Pratchett and never intended to, which is pretty typical of that kind of angry elitism.

As someone who has been deeply impacted by Terry’s ideas about character and storytelling, that article made me so mad. Livid. Terry Pratchett levels of righteous fury.

Can I tell you how happy and unsurprised I am that Terry himself wrote such a lovely takedown of that snobbish, splainy mentality.

A thing being popular doesn’t automatically make it bad, and fantastic elements don’t make a work of literature into not-literature.

transallobenvolio:

bisexuality is in NO WAY regressive. it is in NO WAY outdated. bisexuality is NOT some less-woke version of ‘pansexual’ or ‘q*eer’; bisexuality is a whole identity with history and future and pain and pride bursting from behind its syllables. bisexual people are beautiful and complex and unique individuals and just bc you cant fit them in a biphobic and transphobic little box does not mean you have the right to erase who we are and how weve changed the world. biphobes should shut up and listen to the varying experiences and struggles and lives of bi people, from the oldest to the youngest in our community, and maybe then we’d be able to educate people instead of others shouting over us bc they dont want us to be recognized as a real and valid identity

backofthebookshelf:

th3skinny:

re-cover-ed:

“Fat acceptance” blogs urging overweight people to shed negative feelings about their body image can lead to healthier diet and exercise choices, a study has found.

The fat acceptance movement, which seeks to foster a support network among overweight people, has inspired a plethora of blogs and web forums such as CorpulentFat Heffalump and The Rotund — an online community that’s become known as the “fatosphere”.

In a study published in the journal Qualitative Health Research, researchers from Monash University, the University of New England and the University of Canberra interviewed 44 fatosphere bloggers from Australia, the US and the UK about how their involvement in the movement had changed them.

“There’s been a lot of criticism of the movement that it promotes obesity and encourages people to give up on weight loss and makes their health worse,” said one of the researchers, Dr Samantha Thomas, a Senior Research Fellow at Monash University’s Department of Marketing.

“We saw there was a lot of opinion about the movement but very few people had actually studied it.”

Interviews with the respondents revealed many had experienced feelings of worthlessness, shame, crash diets, cycles of starvation and binge eating and laxative abuse before discovering the fatosphere.

“Having that support and feeling empowered, people slowly found that their health behaviours began to change dramatically. For example, many people suddenly felt confident to do swimming, something they would not have done before,” she said.

“People shifted their focus away from weight loss and more toward health. A lot of people started to take part in physical activity not as a way to lose weight but because they enjoyed it. Instead of pounding it out on the treadmill they start playing with their kids. It’s actually a massive shift in the way they looked at things.”

Shifting the focus away from restricting food and toward listening to the body’s needs could also lead to better food choices, said Dr Thomas.

“There are actually a lot of lessons for public health here,” she said.

“The term fat acceptance is really confronting for people. That’s why we have seen a lot of blame and criticism. Society tells us it’s not OK to be fat for a whole bunch of moral and medical reasons,” she said.

“This study shows that far from promoting obesity and promoting negative health behaviours, the movement is really positive for some people’s health.”

So basically, if fat-bashers actually cared about people’s health (as they so often claim to as an excuse for their intolerance and hatred) then they’d actually support fat acceptance instead of trying to tear body-positive folks down?

Surprise! When you’re not made to feel miserable about yourself, you become more motivated to take care of the self that you have. Who knew?